Agrarian
Bulletin
of the Urals

Russian Journal of Agricultural Research

The publication is registered by the Ministry of the Russian Federation
for Affairs of the Press, Television and Radio Broadcasting and Mass Communication Media.
Registration certificate: PI number 77-12831 on May 31, 2002
Subscription index in catalog «Russian Press» - 16356
ISSN 1997 - 4868 (Print)

The Journal is included in the list of the leading peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications, which should be published by the main results of theses for the degree of doctor and Ph.D.
The Journal is included in the Russian Science Citation Index.
Journal is included in the list of VAK (from 25.09.2017), No. 291

ISSN 2307-0005 (Online)
Key title: Agrarnyj vestnik Urala (Online)
Abbreviated key title: Agrar. vestn. Urala (Online)

Аграрный вестник Урала № 03 (145) 2016

Животноводство

Тухбатов И. А. кандидат сельскохозяйственных наук, доцент Южно-Уральский государственный аграрный университет

УДК:636.087.8

INTESTINAL BACTERIAL COMPOSITION CHANGES OF CHICKEN-BROILERS WITH INCLUDING IN THE DIET OF A PROBIOTIC AND A SORBENT

Bacteriological tests of chicken-broilers litter fed a diet of feed additive flask Krasnogvardeiskoe field of Sverdlovsk regionand at a dose of 3.0 % of diet dry matter and the production of probiotic fugate “Biosporin”, both separately and togethershowed that diurnal birds observed in the litter presence of E. coli and yeast cells. The second study in two weeks have shownthat the greatest positive changes of the bacterial composition of the litter observed in the group supplemented with probioticsand is accompanied by a decrease in the number of E. coli at 68.0 %, with the addition flask its amount decreased by 20.0 %,in combined feeding two feed additives – by 60.0 % as compared with the control group, which has its counted 2.5 × 109/g.In the litter completely absent lactose-negative Escherichia coli, and the number decreased from poorly fermented 2.0 × 107/gin the control group to 0.1 × 107/g – the group with flasks up 0.05 × 107/g – with a probiotic to 0.07 × 107/g – when sharingtheir feeding. With a decrease in poultry litter lactose-negative and poorly fermented E. coli has increased the proportion oflactose-positive, which favorably affected the growth and development of lactic acid bacteria, the amount of which in the litterof broiler group with the addition flask rose to 10.0 × 108/g, or 20 times, with the addition of probiotic – to 30.0 × 108/g, or 60times, at their joint use – to 28.0 × 108/g, or 56 times as compared with the control group, in which there 0.5 × 108/g. Flaskshas reduced the number of Enterococcus in the litter twice (1.5 × 106/g), and in the group with the addition of probiotics and,together with flask they were completely absent, as well as conditionally pathogenic microflora.


Keywords:

chicken-broilers, rearing, feeding, bacterial composition of the intestine, feed additive, probiotic, flasks, agerelated changes.


References:

1. Birger M. O. Handbook of microbiological and virological research methods. M. : Medicine, 1982. 464 p.

2. Gulyushin S., Sadovnikov N., R’abchik I. Efficacy of probiotic Agrimos in compound feed for broilers // Poultry. 2010. № 5. P. 11–12.

3. Donnik I. M. Assessing the impact of probiotic preparation Monosporin in starting circuits the body’s condition of chicken-broilers // Innovative methods and their development in the poultry industry : materials of XVII Intern. conf. Sergiev Posad : All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry, 2012. P. 169–170.

4. Egorov I. Immunity modern broiler crosses // Poultry. 2007. № 12. P. 10–12.

5. Kurmanaeva V. V. Changes of the immune status of broiler chickens under the influence of biological products // Bulletin of the Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2013. № 2. P. 74–76.

6. Mozgov I. E. Pharmacological stimulants in animal husbandry. M. : Kolos, 1964. 352 p.

7. Nozdrin G. A., Kazantseva T. G. Effect of probiotic “Vetom 13.1” on the chemical composition of muscle tissue in geese // Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2012. № 5. P. 46–47.

8. Ovchinnikov A. A., Tuhbatov I. A., Lakomyi A. A. Hematological indicators in broiler chickens when used in the diet probitoks and toksfin // Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2015. № 7. P. 40–44.

9. Ovchinnikov A. A., Matrosova Yu. V., Maghakyan V. Sh. Influence of complex feed additive based on glauconite and probiotics on the productivity of broiler chickens // Proceedings of the Orenburg Agrarian University. 2011. № 4. P. 181–183.

10. Ovchinnikov A. A., Shamin O. O. The efficiency of an enzyme Avizim and probiotic in diets of broilers // Feeding of agricultural animals and fodder production. 2013. № 10. P. 43–48.

11. Okolelova T. M., Laptev G. Y., Bolshakova V. N., Nikonov I. N. Microbiological balance in the gastrointestinal tract and broiler performance when used in compound feeds probiotic and fitobiotic // Innovative methods and their development in the poultry industry : materials of XVII Intern. conf. Sergiev Posad : All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry, 2012. P. 239–241.

12. Ushakova N. A., Nekrasov R. V., Pravdin V. G., Kravtsova L. Z. and others. New generation of probiotic preparations fodder // Basic Research. 2012. № 1. P. 184–192.

13. Shatskikh E. V., Lebedeva I. A., Zelenskaya O. V. Features of feeding of broiler chickens in the early postnatal period // The role of young scientists in the implementation of “AIC Development” national project : coll. of materials of scientif. and pract. conf. M., 2007. Part 2. P. 328–331.


Download article as PDF:

Our database contains 2917 authors

We have published 2740 articles in 133 issues.

Bg